One "fact' about abstinence only education is that it's, "programs showed few short-term benefits and no lasting, positive impact. A few programs showed mild success at improving attitudes and intentions to abstain. No program was able to demonstrate a positive impact on sexual behavior over time." These are words taken not from opinions but results, and if treated rationally would eliminate public funding for abstinence only education.
Facts, while possibly changeable in perception to slight degrees stand on their own. Most people would agree that facts, opposed to political rhetoric and the framing of facts, should be the biggest influence in public policy. At least with the issues I discuss this is not really the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment